The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Wyoming

Mountain West · 6–3 · 5–1 in conference · MRI Classic #90

Power-13.3#117 of 138
Résumé-0.94#173 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winAir Force (28–14)
Worst lossColorado State (13–35)
Schedule faced-13.8 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-8.7 avg opponent
Roster talent#121 of 127 · worth -8.2, rated -13.3: short of it
Returning production23% of last year's · #89 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+5.2 pts · 3rd of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 9 games, w is 69%, so the preseason prior is 31% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted+1.2 avg× 69%+0.8
Opponents faced-13.8 avg× 69%-9.5
Preseason prior-14.9× 31%-4.6
Power-13.3

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Colorado State L 13–35 -3.1 -18.9 -2.9
2 vs Northern Colorado FCS W 21–13 +23.4 -15.4 -2.3
3 at Central Michigan L 10–24 -5.0 -9.0 -2.1
4 vs Hawaii W 27–10 +1.3 +15.7 +0.6
5 at North Dakota State L 0–28 -13.2 -14.8 -2.5
6 at San Jose State W 16–13 -3.7 +6.7 -0.4
7 vs Northern Illinois W 41–23 +14.7 +3.3 -0.4
8 vs Air Force W 28–14 -6.3 +20.3 +0.9
10 at UNLV W 41–35 -10.2 +16.2 +0.4
Preseason prior (31% of the rating)-4.6
Power-13.3

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
11 at UTEP +9.3 71%
12 vs New Mexico -16.0 17%
13 vs UConn -4.3 40%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Bill Lewis1978–19799-15–
Pat Dye19806-5–
Al Kincaid1981–198529-29-2.4
Dennis Erickson19866-6+5.9
Paul Roach1987–199035-15+2.0
Joe Tiller1991–199639-30-1+0.5
Dana Dimel1997–199922-13-0.6
Vic Koenning2000–20025-29-8.7
Joe Glenn2003–200830-41-2.4
Dave Christensen2009–201327-35-3.3
Craig Bohl2014–202361-60-0.4
Jay Sawvel2024–202613-20-5.9

Season by season

Best finish: #21 in 1988. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #87 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI Classic): #67 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI Classic): #86 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI Classic): #51 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI Classic): #75 of 120 (5-7)2008 (MRI Classic): #103 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI Classic): #78 of 120 (7-6)2010 (MRI Classic): #98 of 120 (3-9)2011 (MRI Classic): #78 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI Classic): #91 of 124 (4-8)2013 (MRI Classic): #100 of 126 (5-7)2014 (MRI Classic): #91 of 128 (4-8)2015 (MRI Classic): #120 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI Classic): #62 of 128 (8-6)2017 (MRI Classic): #53 of 130 (8-5)2018 (MRI Classic): #75 of 130 (6-6)2019 (MRI Classic): #39 of 130 (8-5)1978 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 138 (5-7)1979 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 138 (4-8)1980 (MRI 2.0): #69 of 138 (6-5)1981 (MRI 2.0): #35 of 136 (8-3)1982 (MRI 2.0): #68 of 105 (5-7)1983 (MRI 2.0): #58 of 105 (7-5)1984 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 106 (6-6)1985 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 106 (3-8)1986 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 105 (6-6)1987 (MRI 2.0): #31 of 104 (10-3)1988 (MRI 2.0): #21 of 104 (11-2)1989 (MRI 2.0): #49 of 106 (5-6)1990 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 107 (9-4)1991 (MRI 2.0): #66 of 107 (4-7)1992 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 107 (5-7)1993 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 106 (8-4)1994 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 107 (6-6)1995 (MRI 2.0): #50 of 108 (6-5)1996 (MRI 2.0): #38 of 111 (10-2)1997 (MRI 2.0): #39 of 112 (7-6)1998 (MRI 2.0): #52 of 112 (8-3)1999 (MRI 2.0): #57 of 114 (7-4)2000 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 116 (1-10)2001 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 117 (2-9)2002 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 117 (2-10)2003 (MRI 2.0): #89 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 117 (7-5)2005 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 119 (6-6)2007 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 119 (5-7)2008 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 120 (4-8)2009 (MRI 2.0): #97 of 120 (7-6)2010 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 120 (3-9)2011 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 120 (8-5)2012 (MRI 2.0): #100 of 124 (4-8)2013 (MRI 2.0): #104 of 125 (5-7)2014 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 128 (4-8)2015 (MRI 2.0): #119 of 128 (2-10)2016 (MRI 2.0): #78 of 128 (8-6)2017 (MRI 2.0): #74 of 130 (8-5)2018 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 130 (6-6)2019 (MRI 2.0): #65 of 130 (8-5)2020 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 128 (2-4)2021 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 130 (7-6)2022 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 131 (7-6)2023 (MRI 2.0): #79 of 133 (9-4)2024 (MRI 2.0): #112 of 134 (3-9)2025 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 136 (4-8) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 4–8 #108 of 136 · -12.28 –
2024 3–9 #112 of 134 · -12.64 –
2023 9–4 #79 of 133 · -3.30 –
2022 7–6 #103 of 131 · -10.09 –
2021 7–6 #91 of 130 · -5.70 –
2020 2–4 #72 of 128 · -0.78 –
2019 8–5 #65 of 130 · -0.31 #39 of 130 · 38.36
2018 6–6 #88 of 130 · -4.94 #75 of 130 · 18.99
2017 8–5 #74 of 130 · -1.65 #53 of 130 · 30.93
2016 8–6 #78 of 128 · -4.64 #62 of 128 · 24.54
2015 2–10 #119 of 128 · -20.62 #120 of 128 · -45.35
2014 4–8 #107 of 128 · -13.24 #91 of 128 · -3.73
2013 5–7 #104 of 125 · -13.50 #100 of 126 · -15.82
2012 4–8 #100 of 124 · -12.31 #91 of 124 · -4.15
2011 8–5 #88 of 120 · -8.36 #78 of 120 · 8.22
2010 3–9 #99 of 120 · -12.59 #98 of 120 · -15.39
2009 7–6 #97 of 120 · -11.14 #78 of 120 · 7.47
2008 4–8 #108 of 120 · -15.78 #103 of 120 · -21.51
2007 5–7 #79 of 119 · -5.73 #75 of 120 · 14.86
2006 6–6 #65 of 119 · -2.04 #51 of 119 · 34.19
2005 4–7 #78 of 119 · -4.30 #86 of 119 · 8.31
2004 7–5 #72 of 117 · -2.88 #67 of 117 · 22.01
2003 4–8 #89 of 117 · -9.94 #87 of 117 · -1.23
2002 2–10 #100 of 117 · -14.70 –
2001 2–9 #103 of 117 · -16.60 –
2000 1–10 #101 of 116 · -16.81 –
1999 7–4 #57 of 114 · 0.49 –
1998 8–3 #52 of 112 · 0.89 –
1997 7–6 #39 of 112 · 5.25 –
1996 10–2 #38 of 111 · 6.33 –
1995 6–5 #50 of 108 · 1.90 –
1994 6–6 #64 of 107 · -1.65 –
1993 8–4 #57 of 106 · -1.88 –
1992 5–7 #72 of 107 · -3.92 –
1991 4–7 #66 of 107 · -4.49 –
1990 9–4 #57 of 107 · -0.66 –
1989 5–6 #49 of 106 · 2.23 –
1988 11–2 #21 of 104 · 13.76 –
1987 10–3 #31 of 104 · 7.80 –
1986 6–6 #60 of 105 · -1.71 –
1985 3–8 #83 of 106 · -11.18 –
1984 6–6 #72 of 106 · -4.33 –
1983 7–5 #58 of 105 · -2.43 –
1982 5–7 #68 of 105 · -4.40 –
1981 8–3 #35 of 136 · 7.66 –
1980 6–5 #69 of 138 · -0.54 –
1979 4–8 #107 of 138 · -7.29 –
1978 5–7 #60 of 138 · 2.20 –