The MRI
2026 · Week 11

Ball State

MAC · 3–7 · 2–4 in conference · MRI Classic #123

Power-22.8#133 of 138
Résumé-3.69#225 · wins above average
Playoff chance<0.1%out of the picture
Trendrating by week

Who to root for this week

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Nothing this weekend moves the needle.

Best winBowling Green (32–31)
Worst lossKent State (13–26)
Schedule faced-10.4 avg opponent
Schedule ahead-9.1 avg opponent
Roster talent#108 of 127 · worth -6.4, rated -22.8: short of it
Returning production6% of last year's · #120 of 128 · counted against its preseason rating
Home field+2.3 pts · 115th of 131

How this rating is built

Power = w × (average margin counted + average opponent rating) + (1 − w) × preseason prior, where w = games ÷ (games + 4). After 10 games, w is 71%, so the preseason prior is 29% of this rating. Every game played shrinks that share.

PartValueWeightAdds
Margin counted-12.7 avg× 71%-9.1
Opponents faced-10.4 avg× 71%-7.4
Preseason prior-22.1× 29%-6.3
Power-22.8

This explains how the model reached the number. The opponent ratings come out of the same fitted model, so it is not independent proof that the rating is right.

Results

Expected is the margin the model's ratings imply for that matchup and site. Perf is how far the actual margin beat it — the result against expectation. Adds is a different question: how many points of Power the game contributes, counting its margin and the strength of the opponent together. A game can beat expectation and still add little, or the reverse. Adds, plus the preseason prior, sum to Power (figures are rounded so the column adds up). Hover an Adds figure for its arithmetic.

WkOpponentResult ExpectedPerfAdds
1 at Ohio State L 3–56 -52.6 -0.4 -1.2
2 vs Stony Brook FCS W 41–17 +13.9 +10.1 -1.5
3 at Liberty L 15–51 -28.8 -7.2 -2.4
4 at Kent State L 13–26 -5.0 -8.0 -2.5
5 vs Toledo L 24–39 -17.7 +2.7 -1.7
6 at Northwestern L 14–45 -37.9 +6.9 -1.5
7 at Bowling Green W 32–31 -6.7 +7.7 -1.1
8 vs Sacramento State W 34–17 +3.6 +13.4 -0.3
10 at UMass L 30–31 -7.1 +6.1 -1.2
11 vs Buffalo L 7–28 -5.2 -15.8 -3.1
Preseason prior (29% of the rating)-6.3
Power-22.8

Remaining schedule

WkOpponent ProjectedWin prob
12 at Ohio -19.1 12%
13 vs Central Michigan -8.5 30%

Coaches

Mean added leaves out 1978–1980, the first seasons rated, which have no preseason prior to measure against.

CoachYearsRecordMean added
Dwight Wallace1978–198440-37-8.2
Paul Schudel1985–199460-48-4-3.0
Bill Lynch1995–200237-53-4.7
Brady Hoke2003–200834-38-0.9
Stan Parrish2009–20106-18-13.4
Pete Lembo2011–201533-29-2.4
Mike Neu2016–202440-63-2.8
Mike Uremovich2025–20267-15-6.5

Season by season

Best finish: #15 in 1978. 48 seasons rated. The two columns' numbers are not comparable; the rank within each is. Season links open that year's game log.

25 1 150 2003 (MRI Classic): #93 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI Classic): #110 of 117 (2-9)2005 (MRI Classic): #99 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI Classic): #83 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI Classic): #58 of 120 (7-6)2008 (MRI Classic): #25 of 120 (12-2)2009 (MRI Classic): #107 of 120 (2-10)2010 (MRI Classic): #105 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI Classic): #98 of 120 (6-6)2012 (MRI Classic): #53 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI Classic): #38 of 126 (10-3)2014 (MRI Classic): #86 of 128 (5-7)2015 (MRI Classic): #113 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI Classic): #92 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI Classic): #127 of 130 (2-10)2018 (MRI Classic): #107 of 130 (4-8)2019 (MRI Classic): #58 of 130 (5-7)1978 (MRI 2.0): #15 of 138 (10-1)1979 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 138 (6-5)1980 (MRI 2.0): #60 of 138 (6-5)1981 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 136 (4-7)1982 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 105 (5-6)1983 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 105 (6-5)1984 (MRI 2.0): #103 of 106 (3-8)1985 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 106 (4-7)1986 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 105 (6-5)1987 (MRI 2.0): #94 of 104 (4-7)1988 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 104 (8-3)1989 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 106 (7-5)1990 (MRI 2.0): #80 of 107 (7-4)1991 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 107 (6-5)1992 (MRI 2.0): #91 of 107 (5-6)1993 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 106 (8-4)1994 (MRI 2.0): #87 of 107 (5-6)1995 (MRI 2.0): #83 of 108 (7-4)1996 (MRI 2.0): #64 of 111 (8-4)1997 (MRI 2.0): #84 of 112 (5-6)1998 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 112 (1-10)1999 (MRI 2.0): #113 of 114 (0-11)2000 (MRI 2.0): #107 of 116 (5-6)2001 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 117 (5-6)2002 (MRI 2.0): #99 of 117 (6-6)2003 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 117 (4-8)2004 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 117 (2-9)2005 (MRI 2.0): #102 of 119 (4-7)2006 (MRI 2.0): #88 of 119 (5-7)2007 (MRI 2.0): #72 of 119 (7-6)2008 (MRI 2.0): #43 of 120 (12-2)2009 (MRI 2.0): #105 of 120 (2-10)2010 (MRI 2.0): #109 of 120 (4-8)2011 (MRI 2.0): #101 of 120 (6-6)2012 (MRI 2.0): #75 of 124 (9-4)2013 (MRI 2.0): #62 of 125 (10-3)2014 (MRI 2.0): #90 of 128 (5-7)2015 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 128 (3-9)2016 (MRI 2.0): #108 of 128 (4-8)2017 (MRI 2.0): #127 of 130 (2-10)2018 (MRI 2.0): #117 of 130 (4-8)2019 (MRI 2.0): #92 of 130 (5-7)2020 (MRI 2.0): #61 of 128 (7-1)2021 (MRI 2.0): #96 of 130 (6-7)2022 (MRI 2.0): #111 of 131 (5-7)2023 (MRI 2.0): #116 of 133 (4-8)2024 (MRI 2.0): #124 of 134 (3-9)2025 (MRI 2.0): #133 of 136 (4-8) MRI 2.0Classic 1978 2025

Finishing rank, best at the top, on an axis running to 150 — this team's own range, not the size of the field. Two lines where both ratings cover a season - MRI 2.0 in red, Classic in grey. Hover a point for the season.

SeasonRec MRI 2.0MRI Classic
2025 4–8 #133 of 136 · -22.64 –
2024 3–9 #124 of 134 · -16.99 –
2023 4–8 #116 of 133 · -14.71 –
2022 5–7 #111 of 131 · -12.31 –
2021 6–7 #96 of 130 · -8.42 –
2020 7–1 #61 of 128 · 1.98 –
2019 5–7 #92 of 130 · -6.99 #58 of 130 · 20.49
2018 4–8 #117 of 130 · -18.02 #107 of 130 · -28.03
2017 2–10 #127 of 130 · -26.77 #127 of 130 · -65.17
2016 4–8 #108 of 128 · -13.61 #92 of 128 · -4.10
2015 3–9 #108 of 128 · -16.80 #113 of 128 · -33.36
2014 5–7 #90 of 128 · -8.93 #86 of 128 · 2.71
2013 10–3 #62 of 125 · 1.38 #38 of 126 · 49.01
2012 9–4 #75 of 124 · -4.43 #53 of 124 · 33.68
2011 6–6 #101 of 120 · -13.17 #98 of 120 · -14.13
2010 4–8 #109 of 120 · -19.12 #105 of 120 · -30.64
2009 2–10 #105 of 120 · -14.51 #107 of 120 · -23.97
2008 12–2 #43 of 120 · 4.70 #25 of 120 · 51.65
2007 7–6 #72 of 119 · -3.51 #58 of 120 · 30.13
2006 5–7 #88 of 119 · -8.22 #83 of 119 · 3.82
2005 4–7 #102 of 119 · -15.64 #99 of 119 · -15.28
2004 2–9 #108 of 117 · -18.63 #110 of 117 · -29.72
2003 4–8 #102 of 117 · -14.70 #93 of 117 · -9.77
2002 6–6 #99 of 117 · -13.72 –
2001 5–6 #99 of 117 · -14.58 –
2000 5–6 #107 of 116 · -19.75 –
1999 0–11 #113 of 114 · -25.46 –
1998 1–10 #107 of 112 · -21.39 –
1997 5–6 #84 of 112 · -10.07 –
1996 8–4 #64 of 111 · -3.28 –
1995 7–4 #83 of 108 · -9.79 –
1994 5–6 #87 of 107 · -12.42 –
1993 8–4 #83 of 106 · -9.06 –
1992 5–6 #91 of 107 · -11.98 –
1991 6–5 #84 of 107 · -10.92 –
1990 7–4 #80 of 107 · -9.91 –
1989 7–5 #75 of 106 · -9.03 –
1988 8–3 #75 of 104 · -7.72 –
1987 4–7 #94 of 104 · -15.02 –
1986 6–5 #91 of 105 · -14.67 –
1985 4–7 #99 of 106 · -17.99 –
1984 3–8 #103 of 106 · -19.95 –
1983 6–5 #94 of 105 · -16.29 –
1982 5–6 #94 of 105 · -15.59 –
1981 4–7 #113 of 136 · -9.61 –
1980 6–5 #60 of 138 · 0.57 –
1979 6–5 #43 of 138 · 4.73 –
1978 10–1 #15 of 138 · 13.27 –